I don’t usually have much to say about movie length features. It’s not that I don’t enjoy some of the offerings out of Hollywood, but, generally, as much thought goes into a film as goes through the mind of a ninth grader with a handful of condoms. But the latest offering from Canadian James Cameron is one that has some valuable insights that might just have been missed by the typical reviewer.
The strong central theme of the film is that a peaceful and nature loving people will inevitably be called upon to fight and protect themselves. This is a new plank in the liberal mindset, and may come as a surprise to those accustomed to the surrendering posture of the left. Essentially, the message is that it’s crucial to keep your guard up, because you never know when those nasty Americans might cross the borde . . . I mean, you never know when they might come across the galaxy, expending tons of carbon into the universe, just to rob an indigenous population of it’s closely guarded, but unused, resources. And, yes, in case you’re wondering, apparently Cameron does see war as the answer! I’m telling you right now, if there are aliens in the universe who see soiled diapers as a resource, come and get ‘em cuz we ain’t using ‘em! No need to hit me with a death ray!
But the most comforting message from Cameron is the setting of the film in the year 2154, a clear indication that he see the arguments of so called “expert climatologists” as pure bunk. Although, setting the film in, say, the year 2014 would have been useful to get Barack Obama’s face in front of the Na’vi and give him another chance to apologize for American exceptionalism, we did, afterall, master interstellar travel even if we are a warlike species! There could have been a fadeout ending with the Na’vi moving into public housing and Obama receiving the Intergalactic Peace Prize he so deserves. Who knew there were so many peace-loving species?
I think the most disappointing aspect of Cameron’s message is the inherent weaknesses of a peaceful and nature-loving species. And, history repeats itself when victory is achieved only after a noble white man rises to stop the surge. But hey, maybe al-Qaeda will see the movie and begin kidnapping white non-combatants to act as something other than a sacrifice in the name of peace!
So what should we take from this film? Live a peaceful existence or be ready for pirating aliens out to scoop up our scarcities? Maybe we should look deeper and understand that even liberals are conflicted with their own vision of the future. Though they loathe us, they want us on that wall, they NEED us on that wall. While stopping short of apologizing for liberal attempts to dismantle this, the world’s greatest nation, this movie goes a long way towards reinforcing the idea of “speak softly and carry a big stick.”
Theodore Roosevelt would be proud, now if only we could bag one of those Na’vi for the Smithsonian.
